You should set your capture settings to the highest level that you can in order to get the best quality capture that you can. PICVideo MJPEG be it hardware (like the DC10+) or the software codec EITHER WAY this is just an intermediate stage. although due to the particulars of my capture card and driver I must capture at 688x480 then pad it up to 720x480 but that really doesn't affect quality in a negative way. So I don't know how this compares to the DC10+Īlso with a PCI type capture card (I have an Avermedia AverTV Stereo PCI capture card) I can capture more than 640x480. I would do 20 but I drop frames at 20 since my computer is a bit slow. I always use the next step down (quality setting 19). When using the software version of the PICVideo MJPEG codec you set the quality on a scale with 20 being best.
compatibility with all manner of OHCI DV editing software Twice as fast encoding to MPEG using same settings in Procoder 2.01ĥ. I cannot see the degradation of color in the ADVC's 4:1:1 DV capture or MPEG encoded from ADVC DV captureĢ. It's greatest strengths are it's 4:2:2 color sampling and adjustable video and audio bitrates.Īfter careful consideration, I must declare the ADVC-100 the absolute winner for the following reasons:ġ. The DC10+'s drawback is the maximum capture resolution of 640x480 in NTSC mode. Neither capture method suffered from any dropped frames, noise, blockiness, or other major defects. I also compared bmp stills of the same frame from each source captured from the MPEG files.īased on picture quality it is a very, very tight race. Subjective picture quality testing done by observering encoded MPEG's using WinDVD 5 software DVD player on 19" Sony Trinitron monitor. MPEG settings: DVD, CBR 7000kbps, highest quality, mp2 audio 224 Video source: s-video and analog audio from Toshiba DVD player Well, I have just finished tonights grand experiment:
0 kommentar(er)
